Feature Articles

Guest Feature

In this area, experts write articles on current and controversial themes from across the equestrian world. You can post questions to the authors and get into dialogue with them, as well as other users. You can also choose to receive notifications of new posts. All past features are in the drop-down menu above. (You do not need to subcribe to read Guest Features.)

Jane Naughton
Jane Naughton

Jane is a lifetime lover and competitor of horses. She emigrated from the UK, where she had much success as a showing and performance pony rider, to Southern Spain where she lives with her small team of dressage horses. She has trained closely with mentor and dressage expert, George Prause, for over 10 years and takes pride in developing her knowledge on a daily basis, fitting the horses in alongside a very busy job as a PA to a medical surgeon.

Jane has broken and trained all of her horses from buying them as youngsters to at least PSG, not having had the funds to buy ready-made schoolmasters. The journeys she has taken with each horse have added to her knowledge and experience, which she uses now to train other riders. Competing in 2013 in Spain, Jane and her Small Tour horse Ruben were the highest ranked foreign combination on the Spanish National circuit, being in the top 10 of the Small Tour rankings for much of the year. Her ambition is to become a full time professional dressage rider.

Bitless in dressage?

22 January 2014

Somewhere along the line, dressage seems to have got itself a bad name with animal cruelty campaigners with the rollkur/hyperflexion debate coming to the forefront in the last few years, along with its subsequent rule changes with the FEI and National Federations. Add to this the rising popularity of natural horsemanship, and ‘metal-free horses’ and you arrive at the debate which is developing daily within internet chatrooms worldwide.

Hugo, Jane's stallion is a happy athlete in a bit.

But how relevant is bitless in competitive dressage and are the errors of a few dressage professionals reflecting badly on the majority in our sport with regards to the use of bits? And where does this leave us moving forwards?

What clinched it for me in choosing to write on this topic was an unfortunate, unnecessary and surprisingly heated exchange on a recent internet forum here in Spain. A woman replying to an advert for second hand bits with a picture of a particular double bridle set she wanted to buy for her horse was met, within an hour, with a barrage of comments and abuse about why on earth she needed the bit set and that bitless bridles were the way forward. To which she replied, she had to comply with the rules of the federation to be able to compete and that her 17.2hh warmblood stallion would be preferable in competition in a bit! The final response to this was that she simply needed to castrate her stallion!

A happy Olympic athelete in a double bridle

Whatever happened to having reasonable discussion and respecting other peoples’ views? Is it time to worry when you dare not mention you are using bits (or shoes) on your horses without getting an aggressive response from the advocates of metal-free horses who claim to just be offering people the choice. Horses have always been and will be an emotive subject that divides opinion on endless matters from training and shoeing, to feeding and stable management. Our love for these four-legged creatures has developed a seemingly endless range of sports, equipment, training methods and opinion. But where does it end and who is right? Is any one opinion the correct one and ultimately, with such a wide variety of breeds, sizes and personalities of our equines, can ‘one size’ really fit all?

An example of a bitless bridle (Dr Cooke version)On researching this article, I have attained wide opinion of the bitless supporters from many internet forums and websites from around the world (which I read with great interest), although how many of these are competing dressage horses at a higher level or have experience of the type of dressage athlete many of us do actually ride on a day to day basis, was not known. Really, the internet allows us to give our opinion in a faceless manner – only the person writing the post can know what kind of experience they have. And how many of these bitless horses were the feisty, willful primadonnas that so many of us ride at higher level dressage? How many of the horses ridden bitless were broken in this way too? And why seemingly, it is only dressage where the bitless campaign seems to be centred? Unless I’m searching in the wrong places, show jumping and eventing seem to have been left alone – why? It could be because of the plethora of gadgets already allowed in these sports, or that dressage is more accessible to the pleasure rider wanting to compete at a lower level.

Having also asked fellow professional dressage colleagues to give an opinion if they thought horses could perform bitless, they all seemed to be of the same opinion. "It depends on the horse" are their first words - many point to the fabulous examples of liberty exhibitions seen at competitions but make reference to willful, highly strung dressage athletes standing in their own stables and say "well maybe not for mine though!". Truthfully, the examples are few and far between and certainly as yet, none have been able to give an example of an Advanced level bitless dressage horse, although this is probably a lot to do with the rules of competitive dressage.

Jane and Ruben competing in SpainSo, can you really train a horse up to Small Tour or Grand Prix bitless and get the same results as those doing so with a bit? Honestly, why not, everything is possible with enough time and the right horse. But would you really get the same results? Having ridden in a bitless bridle, on occasion, I found it was possible to get the flexion from the seat required for a good lateral movement but not possible to get the exact same flexion from the poll that you would from a bit, the final little part to make the movement totally correct – to get the "7" instead of the "5". I also found that with the sensitivity of my horse, he was far too easily behind the vertical in a bitless bridle. And was he a happier athlete with no bit in his mouth. Honestly, no, he seemed no different from the happy horse being ridden in a bit.

On another point, having recently sat and watched the Olympia London International Horse Show on BBC, I was fascinated by the comment from Tim Stockdale to Clare Balding about the Italian Show Jumper – Luca Moneta, who when riding a horse round the World Cup class in a hackamore made a mistake and knocked a jump down. Tim said that its not easy to ride a horse round a course of jumps that big in a bitless bridle because the line of communication to the horse gets lost and that to turn the horse round the tight corners, he almost had to ‘neck rein’ it. So if a show jumper of that calibre mentions that the control is needed when show jumping a grand prix course, then why do us dressage riders get so much bad press about our riding in bits where the same absolute control is necessary for the elegance and correctness of the movements? And, by control, we don’t mean dominance over our equine partner, we mean the same control needed by a ballerina to perform their graceful and powerful movements, for example.

One of the other comments made from many dressage colleagues is that natural horsemanship and bitless riding seems to largely consist of a very different type of horse than is ‘normal’ for dressage. Iberian horses, for example, are widely used – although with the number of PRE horses in dressage in Spain, this is also a moot point! Is this partially due to their kinder nature and smaller size, which makes them suitable for this? How successful might the bitless rider be with a bolshy young dressage horse who simply wanted to be ‘leader of his herd’?

The very small selection of snaffles allowed in competitionIs it so wrong to ride your horse in a correctly fitted bit with a kind hand? Really, it shouldn’t be. The vast majority of dressage riders, who ride and train their horses in bits, in a sympathetic way show a happy athlete when competing and training. So, is it a little unfair that when promoting the bitless methods in pictures, there are only a handful of the same old pictures going round, of Rollkur? Perhaps there should be a few more photos of the ‘average Joe’ – a happy athlete with a closed soft mouth? After all, there has been a great deal of science involved in the design of bits just as there has been in the design of various bitless bridles. Again, divided opinion!

Looking to the future, will it be a fair competition pitting bitless against bits? And will one side be unfairly judged? Some bitless advocats have argued that it would be riders with bits who would be ‘shown up’ when riders in bitless bridles were able to beat them! Absolutely, but the reserve could also be true. For example, having recently watched a video on Youtube of a ‘bitless dressage championship, the lady who won overall had, for dressage purposes, an incorrect outline, ie. the nose was behind the vertical and the poll was not the highest point. Now if she were to be riding in the same test against riders with bits who had the correct head and neck positioning, then would it not highlight a training problem with the bitless rider?

So then, how do we proceed? There seems to be growing pressure for allowing bitless bridles in federated dressage, with Holland being the first federation to allow bitless bridles from 2014, as a trial. But what has to be mentioned is that this rule change is ONLY for the very lowest levels. There is now a petition circulating to allow it in British Dressage and other governing bodies. Would it be fairer for all concerned if they had their own class? As the rules stand now, there are very few types of bits and nosebands allowed in federated dressage – the snaffles are all the mild simple kind and approximately the same with the double bit sets. This evens the playing field a great deal; by not allowing pelhams, gags and many other stronger bits, competitors start from a more level playing field, the only difference being the hands using the bits! And where will it all end? Will the poor soul trying to ride round a dressage competition on a highly strung 18.2hh warmblood that’s as boisterous as he is big, then start to petition to be allowed a gag or some other equivalent….?

A typical image of Rollkur!

To add bitless into the fold, surely, the federation would have to allow the other extreme as well, as in the case of show jumping where there are a multitude of contraptions permitted in competition that most of us dressage folk have no idea about! Also, the very basis of the rules on judging horses, the movements and the way of going would all have to be changed, meaning that the whole sport would have to have a complete overhaul.

I feel like I have raised more questions than I have answered but this is going to be the case for a very long time until the FEI give a definitive answer to a rule change for bitless competing. This subject probably merits hundreds of pages, going into the science and welfare aspects of bits versus bitless! And it really is ‘horses for courses’, they are all so different, just as we humans are. Whilst some people enjoy riding their horses in bitless bridles (if that’s their preference, it’s perfectly acceptable), its hard to imagine a time where you might see a rider passaging down the centre line at the Olympics in a bitless bridle. In the meantime, perhaps a little more understanding from both sides would be a good starting point, along with better regulations for riders thinking rollkur is acceptable in our modern sport!

(Editor's note: You can also read Jane's blog on Horse Hero.)


Hossnutt 14 Feb 2014 I must admit, I tend to agree with Caitlin when she says 'bitful' is perhaps more important than whether to go bitless or ride with a bit. Having to ride my lads in and around a busy village, where we meet everything from huge lorries to diggers, the local shoot, police/ambulance screaming by, unruly dogs, etc, etc, I feel it's essential that my lads wear bits, as control, brakes and steering are paramount. However, whenever I've had a new horse/pony to ride, my first aim is to work toward getting them back into a snaffle with a lozenge and out of the sometimes 'bear-trap' like clobber someone's decided has been needed to ride the poor thing! And it's not just a case of putting any old snaffle into a horses mouth. One has to take into consideration the internal size and shape of the mouth and tongue. It's always been thought that the wider the mouthpiece, the more gentle on the horse, however, if one puts that same wide bit into the mouth of a horse with a thick, deep but narrow tongue and small mouth, that bit is going to cause problems!
Caitlin 5 Feb 2014 While I appreciate that the argument here is to a large extent about changing, or not changing, the rules regarding competitive dressage, for me the issue is less about bitless vs 'bitful' and more about riding with kindness. I ride my horses in light snaffles; I find that they welcome the bit because it seems to help with the all-important relaxation of the jaw. I am very concerned about the current fashion for flash nosebands, and the more recent abomination of the 'crank' noseband. Not only is strapping a horse's mouth shut cruel, it is also counterproductive in that the restriction so imposed prevents the relaxation that is the key to joyful riding. I find a lot of competitive riding, including dressage, unappealing because the basic principle of kindness so often gets pushed aside by the wish to win. I'd be interested to hear other people's views.
tessan 4 Feb 2014 Well said and put:) Yankee Sweet, interesting read
LittleTurkey 29 Jan 2014 Contentious indeed. I have several comments to make...

Ever heard the phrase "to win your spurs"? I have always considered bits to be on the same level as spurs. Useful tool in the right er hands, but an oppressive, painful menace in the wrong ones. As a coach or trainer, you wouldn't allow a novice who couldn't keep their legs still to use spurs. Likewise, you shouldn't let someone who can't use their hands sympathetically to use a bit. Bitless bridles could be rated in terms of the pressure they put on different parts of the face. Mild ones reserved for prelim to elementary, anything with poll pressure, medium and above. I don't see why letting people compete bitless should mean that the door is open to all manner of contraptions as long as they are all rated in terms of the pressure they put on and the areas of the face they effect.

My second point is that I would like people to stop lumping us performance barefoot horse owners in with the wishy washy so called Natural Horsemanship brigade. I happen to believe that barefoot is better for horses due to solid scientific analysis. This does not mean that I let my horse walk all over me (although it hurts less when they don't have shoes on) or that he is allowed to waft about with his head in the air. I adhere to the dressage scales of training and my barefoot horse is well trained and elegant. Also, his tendons will last longer.

Hossnutt 25 Jan 2014 Wow! I see what you mean Jane about this subject being a 'bone of contention'. I feel there's an awful lot of anger seething underneath some of the comments already made in response to your article. As far as being unbiased, I think I am such a person in this instance for the following reasons: I absolutely love Dressage, when it's trained and performed properly, but I also feel at one with my pony when I ride without a saddle and bridle, and I know he's as happy as I've ever seen him. I'm totally oblivious to this argument going on in forums, as I rarely go on them. However, knowing what I do about the basic tenets of Dressage, I honestly do not see how it would be possible to ride Dressage bitless, with the current 'scales of training' and rules as they currently stand. Like Jane said, everything would have to change, from the contact/connection part of scales of training, to having to allow the whole spectrum of bits to be worn. If you think you've seen distressed horses riding a dressage competition in a snaffle, one can only imagine seeing horses in a Dutch Gag, Pelham or worse all bunched up, hyperflexed, stiff and worried about going forward in a rhythm, being held back by severe 'brakes'!! THAT thought worries me. I believe the only way forward for all those 'alternative' riders out there, is to write their own rule book, etc, and start an 'alternative' Dressage so that everyone's on a level playing field in their respective disciplines. Of course, all those who are unable to ride Dressage in a snaffle, could form their own Dressage too. That's my opinion.

To post a comment you must Register on Horse Hero and Login. Or just login, if you are already registered. Alternatively you can become a full subscriber.

Return to Top Return to Site


Share this Page

Follow Us On:


14939 users rated Horse Hero videos 5 out of 5
Page loaded in 0.0780002000028617 seconds

Subscribe now for instant access to around 1000 training videos from top riders in all equestrian disciplines. The best value training on the web!